Page 35 - Acrobat J Trad-21-3-2566
P. 35

518 วารสารการแพทย์แผนไทยและการแพทย์ ทางเลือก       ปีที่ 21  ฉบับที่ 3  กันยายน-ธันวาคม 2566




           site activity score before and after intervention.      The basic characteristics of the patients,
           Mann Whitney’s U test was used to compare   the lesion classification and the level of pain

           the clinical outcome (between the treatment   and dryness of the oral cavity are provided in
           groups. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to   Table 1. Before the treatment (W0), a total of 20
           be statistically significant.               patients were randomized and allocated to two

                                                       different interventions including 0.1% CHI-
                           Results
                                                       CUR (n = 10) or 0.1% TA mouthwash (n = 10).
           1. Clinical efficacy evaluation of the      However, one patient in the CHI-CUR-treated

              CHI-CUR mouthwash in treating OLP        group was lost to follow up at two weeks
                The participant’s flow diagram is shown    after the treatment and outcome status was
           in Figure 1.                                unknown. Therefore, a per protocol analysis

















































                                          Figure 1  Flow chart of study
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40