Page 35 - Acrobat J Trad-21-3-2566

518 วารสารการแพทย์แผนไทยและการแพทย์ ทางเลือก ปีที่ 21 ฉบับที่ 3 กันยายน-ธันวาคม 2566

site activity score before and after intervention. The basic characteristics of the patients,
Mann Whitney’s U test was used to compare the lesion classification and the level of pain

the clinical outcome (between the treatment and dryness of the oral cavity are provided in
groups. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to Table 1. Before the treatment (W0), a total of 20
be statistically significant. patients were randomized and allocated to two

different interventions including 0.1% CHI-
Results
CUR (n = 10) or 0.1% TA mouthwash (n = 10).
1. Clinical efficacy evaluation of the However, one patient in the CHI-CUR-treated

CHI-CUR mouthwash in treating OLP group was lost to follow up at two weeks
The participant’s flow diagram is shown after the treatment and outcome status was
in Figure 1. unknown. Therefore, a per protocol analysis

Figure 1 Flow chart of study