Page 101 - วารสารกรมการแพทย์แผนไทยฯ ปีที่ 14 ฉบับที่ 3
P. 101

319




              Table 2 The recovery results of andrographolide (n=3)

                Amount of                 Recovery              Average     RSD        Acceptance
              andrographolide               (%)                   (%)       (%)        criteria (%)
              added (μg/mL)        1         2         3

                  26.2            98.9      99.7     99.8        99.5       0.5       97.0-103.0
                  44.9            98.0      97.0     97.1        97.3       0.5       97.0-103.0
                  89.7            97.2      97.0     96.8        97.0       0.2       97.0-103.0



              Table 3 Precision results of andrographolide in  of formulation. Andrographolide is easily dis-
                     Andrographis capsules
                                                         solved in methanol, ethanol, acetic acid, and
                                         Andrographolide  acetone but has limited solubility in ether
              Replicate No.
                                        content (%w/w)   and water, thus polar solvent can be used to
                                                                         [33]
                   1                        0.786        extract the drug.  Extraction solvent and
                   2                        0.784
                                                         time are the two crucial factors that can affect
                   3                        0.785
                                                         the efficiency of ultrasonic extraction. There-
                   4                        0.787
                   5                        0.790        fore, these two factors were investigated in
                   6                        0.790        our experiment. When 100% methanol is used
                 Average                    0.787
                                                         as extracting solvent and the filtrate was then
                RSD (%)                     0.324
                                                         analyzed for their andrographolide contents

                                                         using HPLC, peak shape problem of andro-
              extraction method. Each sample was ex-     grapholide was observed. This is probably due
              tracted in duplicate for each of the extrac-  to mismatch of sample solvent and mobile

              tion method. The contents of andrographolide  phase. In order to eliminate solvent effect,
              (%w/w) obtained from the two techniques    mobile phase itself (50% methanol) is then
              along with the percentage changes were     used as the solvent of sample solutions. Op-

              shown in Table 4.                          timization of sonication time was investigated
                                                         using 50% methanol and the duration of 15
                            Discussion
                                                         minutes gave the highest amount of andro-
                  The choice of a particular method for  grapholide extracted. There is no noteworthy
              extraction of drug from herbal formulations is  difference in the amount of drug extracted

              most commonly determined by the solubility  after 20 minutes. The sonication time of 15
              characteristics of the drug as well as the type  minutes was then taken as the best condition
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106