Page 62 - วารสารกรมการแพทย์แผนไทยฯ ปีที่ 10 ฉบับที่ 3
P. 62

212  «“√ “√°“√·æ∑¬å·ºπ‰∑¬·≈–°“√·æ∑¬å∑“߇≈◊Õ°         ªï∑’Ë 10 ©∫—∫∑’Ë 3°—𬓬π-∏—𫓧¡ 2555





                Abstract
                     Preliminary Report on the Potential of Indigenous Healers Practicing in Orthopedics
                     Tanida Khunboonjan*, Chantana Krapoorit*, Sirilada Pimpa*, Suthon Pornbunditpatthama**
                     *Bureau of Thai Indigenous Medicine, Department for Development of Thai Traditional and Alternative
                     Medicine, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, 11000 THAILAND, ** Expert/Project Consultant
                     *Corresponding author : Tanida1739@hotmail.com
                         Purpose: To gain an in-depth understanding of the background, experiences and clinical
                     outcomes of treatment of bone fracture by indigenous healers.
                         Experimental design: Nine indigenous healers or bone setters were selected for an interview
                     about their experiences and medical instruments used in bone fracture treatment of 216 patients
                     with bone fracture enrolled and treated at the healers’ clinics. After bone fracture recovery, all
                     patients were then evaluated for their clinical outcomes by orthopedic experts.
                         Results: All bone setters were males aged 50-84 years and had had experiences in bone
                     fracture treatment for 20 to 30 years; and most of their chief occupations were farming. Half of
                     indigenous healers had gained the knowledge passed on from their ancestors, while the others
                     had learned from other experienced indigenous healers. Approximately 75% of patients had a
                     bone fracture in the arms while the rest had at in the legs. Of all 216 patients, 53 (24.5%) fully
                     recovered with normal bone alignment and function, 80 (37%) had normal bone function, but
                     misalignment, only 4 (1.9%) had normal bone healing, but malfunction, and 79 (36.3%) had
                     bone deformation and malfunction.
                         Conclusion: Although clinical outcomes of indigenous treatment of bone fracture are not as
                     effective as those treated with modern medicine, it would still be alternative care for the people
                     living in remote areas. Also, we have observed that most people in such areas are satisfied with
                     the indigenous treatment and highly respect indigenous healers. Thus, providing some modern
                     medical information such as diagnosis, x-ray interpretation, and proper treatment to indigenous
                     healers would bring their quality of care close to the established standards.
                     Key words: bone setters, orthopedics, clinical evaluation
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67