Page 49 - journal_14-2_Full

151

4. Coombe RJ. The recognition of indigenous peoplesû and 11. Ong B. Harnessing the biological bounty of nature: mapping
community Traditional knowledge in international law. St. the wilderness of legal, socio-cultural, geo-political, and
Thomas Law Review. 2001;14:278. environmental issues in Burton Ong (ed). Intellectual
5. Marden E. The neem tree patent: international conflict Property and Biological Resources. 2004. p. 11.
over the commodification of life. B.C. Intûl & Comp. L. 12. de Werra J. Fighting against biopiracy: Does the obligation
Rev. 1999;22(2):281-2. to disclose in patent applications truly help?, Vanderbilt J
6. Dolder F. Traditional knowledge and patenting: The Transnatûl L. 2009;42:158.
experience of the neemfungicide and the Hoodia cases, 13. Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and
Biotechnol Law Rep. 2007;26(6):583-87. Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore,
7. Schmidt DE. Postcard from the reality-based universe : Glossary of Key Terms related to Intellectual Property and
Wish you were all here : a mediation on the relationship Genetic Resources. Traditional Knowledge and Traditional
between science, intellectual property law, and the rights Expression prepared by the Secreatariat, Twenty-Third
of indigenous populations in plant genetic resources. Session, Geneva, 4-8 Feb. 2013. WIPO/GRTKF/IC/23/INF/
Environ Law. 2008;38:332. 8. p. 11.
8. Wager H. Biodiversity. Traditional knowledge, and folklore: 14. Hoare AL, Tarasofsky RG. Asking and telling: Can
Work on related IP matters in WTO, intercultural hum. çDisclosure of Originé requirements in patent applications
Rts. L. Rev. 2008;3:215-6. make a difference?. Journal of World Intellectual Property.
9. de Carvalho NP. Requiring disclosure of the origin of genetic 2007;10:158.
resources and prior informed consent in patent applications 15. Martin G. Transparency measures under patent law
without Infringing the TRIPS Agreement: The problem regarding genetic resources and traditional knowledge.
and the solution. WASH. U. J. L. & POLûY. 2000;2:375. World Intell Prop. 2004;7(4):10.
10. Henninger T, Disclosure requirements in patent law and 16. Kogan LA. Brazilûs IP oppotunism threatens U.S. private
related measures: A comparative overview of existing property rights, U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 2006;(38):71-
national and regional legislation on IP and biodiversity. 2.
ICTSD. Switzerland. 2009. p. 3.